In what should be a big leap forward for local democracy and community web media UK central government is to decree in law that local government meetings must be open to local bloggers, tweeters, community web forums etc.
I am not going to do the journalist trick of re-writing a press notice trying to give the impression it is my own wise words so the whole CLG thing is below.
Some observations –
overall this is a very good thing
it might be a world first, but if it is it reflects the weakness of local transparency in the UK that this has to be directed from Whitehall
this is central government acknowledging that hyperlocal web media is important in local scrutiny and accountability ‘The existing media definition will be broadened to cover organisations that provide internet news thereby opening up councils to local online news outlets. ‘
hopefully this will open up the mysterious world of ‘cabinet local government’ where tight groups meet to make major decisions with no public scrutiny
local social media can really open up council-led meetings in new ways if the chair co-operates (see this piece i did in Islington using a blog, audio boo and storify) and bloggers can lead the way as we see the excellent Ventnor Blog doing on the Isle of Wight.
I do hope that this applies to TfL I would dearly like to attend meetings on cycle safety
local TV with tens of millions of public subsidy for a scant 18 areas in the first round doesn’t get a mention. You can find my evidence on Local TV here.
the caveat ‘remove unnecessary and bureaucratic red tape on forward plans’ needs investigating – plans can be an important part of scrutiny, they give you a fixed target against which to judge subsequent performance.
good to see Chris Taggart feature in the press notice – Openly Local has done much that was regarded as impossible in trying to bring some order and structure to online publishing of council information. Chris is a real hero
it’s a delight to know that Margaret Thatcher once led a move to open up council meetings in the 1960s, it’s just a shame that she didn’t follow through rather harder with expanding FOI in the 1980s when in power.
Here’s the CLG press notice.
>
TOWN HALL DOORS UNLOCKED TO SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGGERS
New law changes to introduce greater openness and transparency in executive councils meetings will mean all decisions including those affecting budgets and local services will have to be taken in an open and public forum, Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles announced today.
Ministers have put new regulations before Parliament that would come into force next month to extend the rights of people to attend all meetings of a council’s executive, its committees and subcommittees.
The changes will result in greater public scrutiny. The existing media definition will be broadened to cover organisations that provide internet news thereby opening up councils to local online news outlets. Individual councillors will also have stronger rights to scrutinise the actions of their council.
Any executive decision that would result in the council incurring new spending or savings significantly affecting its budget or where it would affect the communities of two or more council wards will have to be taken in a more transparent way as a result.
Crucially councils will no longer be able to cite political advice as justification for closing a meeting to the public and press. In addition any intentional obstruction or refusal to supply certain documents could result in a fine for the individual concerned.
The changes clarify the limited circumstances where meetings can be closed, for example, where it is likely that a public meeting would result in the disclosure of confidential information. Where a meeting is due to be closed to the public, the council must now justify why that meeting is to be closed and give 28 days notice of such decision.
As a consequence of the greater levels of transparency around meetings, the Government is able to remove unnecessary and bureaucratic red tape on forward plans introduced by legislation in 2000.
Eric Pickles said:
“Every decision a council takes has a major impact on the lives of local people so it is crucial that whenever it takes a significant decision about local budgets that affect local communities whether it is in a full council meeting or in a unheard of sub-committee it has got to be taken in the full glare of all the press and any of the public.
“Margaret Thatcher was first to pry open the doors of Town Hall transparency. Fifty years on we are modernising those pioneering principles so that every kind of modern journalists can go through those doors – be it from the daily reporter, the hyper-local news website or the armchair activist and concerned citizen blogger – councils can no longer continue to persist with a digital divide.”
Chris Taggart, of OpenlyLocal.com, which has long championed the need to open council business up to public scrutiny, added:
“In a world where hi-definition video cameras are under £100 and hyperlocal bloggers are doing some of the best council reporting in the country, it is crazy that councils are prohibiting members of the public from videoing, tweeting and live-blogging their meetings.
Notes to Editors
1. The Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012 (the 2012 Regulations) will come into force on 10 September 2012. Changes include:
Presumption in favour of openness: In the past councils could cite political advice as justification for closing a meeting to the public and press, or state that decisions being made were not ‘key decisions’. The new regulations create a presumption that all meetings of the executive, its committees and subcommittees are to be held in public (regulation 3) unless a narrowly defined legal exception applies. A meeting will only be held in private if confidential information would be disclosed, or a resolution has been passed to exclude the public because exempt information is likely is be disclosed, or a lawful power is used to exclude the public in order to maintain orderly conduct at the meeting (regulation 4).
– Confidential information is information provided to the council by a Government department upon terms which forbid disclosure to the public or information which statute or a court order prohibits from being disclosed to the public.
– Exempt information is set out in Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972 and it includes information about a person, or information that would reveal their identity, consultations or negotiations relating of labour relations, or information in connection with preventing and detecting crime.
New legal rights for citizen reporters: Local authorities are now obliged to provide reasonable facilities for members of the public to report the proceedings as well as accredited newspapers (regulation 4). This will make it easier for new ‘social media’ reporting of council executive meetings thereby opening proceedings up to internet bloggers, tweeting and hyperlocal news forums.
Holding private meetings: In the past council executives could hold meetings in private without giving public notice. Where a meeting is to be held in private, the executive or committee must provide 28 days notice during which the public may make representations about why the meeting should be held in public. Where the notice requirements for a private meeting and an agreement of the chairman of the relevant overview and scrutiny committee or chairman of the relevant local authority has been obtained, the decision-making body must publish a notice as soon as reasonably practicable explaining why the meeting is urgent and cannot be deferred (regulation 5).
Less red tape for councils: Removing internal bureaucracy introduced by the last Government about ‘key decisions’, quarterly reports and ‘forward plans’. Instead, a document explaining the key decision to be made, the matter in respect of which a decision would be made, the documents to be considered before the decision is made, and the procedures for requesting details of those documents, has to be published (regulations 9).
Special urgent decision: Where it is impossible to meet the publication requirements before a key decision is made and an agreement has been obtained from the chairman of the relevant overview and scrutiny committee or the relevant local authority to make the key decision, the decision maker must publish a notice to explain the reasons why the making of the decision is urgent (regulation 11). Previously no notice was required.
Stronger rights of individual councillors: Where an executive has in its the possession a document that contains materials relating to a business to be discussed at a public meeting, members of the local authority have additional rights to inspect such a document at least five days before the meeting (regulation 16). Previously no timescale existed.
Stronger rights for scrutiny members: Where the executive decides not to release the whole or part of a document to a member of an overview and scrutiny committee as requested by a councillor, it must provide a written statement to explain the reasons for not releasing such document (regulation 17).
Publication requirement: Publication of any notice by a decision-making body or a proper officer; or any document in relation to a key decision or public meeting and background papers must be on the relevant local authority’s website (regulations 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, and 21).
1. The Public Bodies (Admission to Meetings) Act 1960 opened up meetings to the public, allowing members of the public and press to attend meetings of certain public bodies including councils. Margaret Thatcher was the backbench MP who championed this as a Private Members Bill.
2. Part 5A of the Local Government Act of 1972 applies to access to meetings and documents of the full council and committees of the councils. It states that ‘duly accredited representatives of newspapers’ should be afforded ‘reasonable facilities’ to attend council meetings ‘for the purpose of reporting proceedings for those newspapers’. It also sets out that for those parts of council meetings that are open to the public, councils are prevented from ejecting members of the public unless they are guilty of disorderly conduct or other ‘misbehaviour’.
3. The Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 provides for greater public access to local authority meetings reports and documents subject to specified confidentiality provisions; to give local authorities duties to publish certain information; and for related purposes.
William Perrin
Latest posts by William Perrin (see all)
- A vision for regulating the digital sphere after Brexit? - 6th April 2017
- Back to the Brexit – simple exercise for discussing Brexit issues - 25th January 2017
- Digital opportunities presented by Brexit – Cardiff discussion - 13th December 2016
Does this apply to Wales? http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/Blogger-arrested-filming-council-meeting/story-12750322-detail/story.html
Appears encouraging at first glance. Goodness knows some councils can be awkward beggers. VentnorBlog is frequently threatened with losing our ‘Accredited media’ status by the Isle of Wight council’s Chief executive Steve Beynon and recently even the rumoured Chief Exec-in-waiting, Stuart Love, has started waving it around too. This issue has become so serious that we’ve even had to get the local MP, Andrew Turner involved.
__Video and audio recording of meetings
Members of the public are generally allowed into council meetings already (at least here on the Isle of Wight). The free audio recording or videoing of it is where this becomes different. We, as VB, still have to ask the Chair’s permission to record each and every Full councli meeting.
__Forward plans – too valuable to lose
As is often the case with grand-sounding announcements, it appears that something very useful is being lost. Well spotted Will.
‘Forward plans’ have been an invaluable source of exposure for us (eg The IWC planning to sell off a much-love viewpoint, not on the open-market, without any members of the public having the slightest knowldege of it.)
To lose Forward Plans under the guise of removing ‘unnecessary and bureaucratic red tape’ would be a considerable blow to those interested in improving the accountability of a local council.