• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Talk About Local HomepageTalk About Local

Hyperlocal in the UK

  • Home
  • Working with us
  • In the press
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • LNE

Neighbourhood plans – is there an easy way?

18th January 2013 by William Perrin

Neighbourhood plans are a great idea but they need to be easy to produce and comprehend. The more complex and dense neighbourhood plans are, the fewer of them there will be. Is there any route to a genuinely simple neighbourhood plan that engages people?
The government website says:

‘People have the right to get involved in development decisions that affect them but in practice they have often found it difficult to have a meaningful say.’

The government website goes on to say:

‘The plan can be detailed or general, depending what local people want.’

A ‘general’ plan sounds attractive – the opposite of the traditional detailed lawerly-wordy plan. From dozens of planning campaigns over the years I know people find it hard to engage with anything written in planning speak.

A quick canter through some of the existing ‘early’ neighbourhood plans driven by pathfinder areas (thanks so much to Much Wenlock for their list of links to neighbourhood plans) shows them to be well drafted, but long and dense documents.  I can’t help but admire the huge amount of local social capital built and invested in these processes.  But if every neighbourhood plan has to be like these then i can’t see many of them being produced, with popular engagement.  That’s not to say that these early plans aren’t fine for their communities, but in my experience it’s hard to engage people in this sort of thing and to get the excellent officer/politician/citizenry combination these self selecting early projects exhibit.

So what might a simple ‘general’ plan look like that can easily connect with local people in large numbers.  (By the way, if you are reading this and are trying to do one, please tell me in the comments).

A plan is a decision making framework for councillors and officers, within which they have discretion.  A simpler ‘general’ plan suggests to my mind a more values driven framework from citizens that is easy to create and engage, then greater discretion for officers and politicians within it.  The existing early plans almost all have a survey stage where questions are asked of local people.  Can the survey result itself, with some judicious judgement exercised by local bodies to prevent hijack,  almost become a simple, general neighbourhood plan? I am not of course, suggesting a direct internet democracy here there has to be some judicious oversight by local bodies to prevent abuse and to reach out to non-internet channels.   The plan then provides simple values driven or emotive guidance to decision makers.

The early plans and the CLG-funded guidance documents point to a set of fairly common themes. So for fun I’ve created a sort of coffee break quiz as on off the shelf starter for a local plan.  The sort of thing that could easily be set up as an internet quiz and promulgated by local websites and email lists.  Get a big enough response then you may be 50% of the way to a neighbourhood plan.  This quiz isn’t intended to be entirely serious, as you can see by the phrasing but I am interested to see what a simple, ‘general’ plan might look like.  All suggestions welcome.

New Housing More Less
Old buildings Away with the old Restore and reuse
Affordable housing More Less
Council/Social housing More Less
New houses Small starter homes Larger family homes
Style of new buildings Heritage/ have to fit in Contemporary
Commercial property More offices No more
Industrial sites New ones Reuse old sites first
Nuclear reactor or waste dump Yes No thank you
Super Casino Yes, Vegas baby No
Pubs and bars More Enough already
Cafes/restaurants More, fill me up No more
Betting shops More please We have enough
Takeaways More kebab Less kebab
Green spaces Protect We need building land
Fibre broadband to homes Yes please Not necessary
Sports stadium Yes. Go team No
Large entertainment venue Yes No, we have enough fun
Shopping Reuse existing shops New complexes
Building in town or out? In town Out of town
Wind Turbines Yes No, eyesore
Solar on houses and gardens Yes No
Biodiversity, wildlife friendliness Important Not important
Historic local sites Important, protect Other things more important
Flooding Important to prevent Not an issue here
Change of use to residential Yes convert guesthouses, offices No
Agricultural buildings Keep them in farming Convert them
Parking We need more parking No, it encourages cars
Homes for retired people Yes please Young more important
Second homes Are welcome No more
Community sport Yes, more pitches No, more x-boxes
Community facilities, village hall, social club Protect or enhance Remove

Disclaimer – these are my personal views and do not represent the views of my clients nor any body else.  I moderate for relevance, bad language etc.

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow Will
William Perrin
Founder of Talk About Local, Trustee of the Indigo Trust, Tinder Foundation, 360Giving, co-founder Connect8, former member of UK Government transparency panels, former Policy Advisor to UK Prime Minister, former Cabinet Office senior civil servant.Open data do-er, Kings Cross London blogger. Loves countryside. Two small children.
Follow Will
Latest posts by William Perrin (see all)
  • So what does the digital charter mean? - 21st June 2017
  • Hyperlocal blog can help hold power to account in tower block blaze - 14th June 2017
  • A vision for regulating the digital sphere after Brexit? - 6th April 2017

Filed Under: Blog, Other Tools and Tips Tagged With: democracy, neighbourhood plan, planning

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Mick Downs says

    8th February 2013 at 1:25 pm

    It sounds like a good idea in theory – to have a simple easily understandable plan – but if you want your neighbourhood plan to have teeth, i.e. to be able to prevent development you don’t want and set clear guidelines and standards for the development that you do want, then it must be legally robust.
    In practice this means following a good process in producing it, including plenty of up front community engagement, and writing the plan mindful that that its policies and its proposals may be challenged at a public inquiry by a QC. A simply worded plan may be unable to withstand such a test.

Footer

Search

  • Contact
  • Guidelines
  • Legal

© 2022 · talk about local · Maintained by Mike