• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Talk About Local HomepageTalk About Local

Hyperlocal in the UK

  • Home
  • Working with us
  • In the press
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • LNE

Don't just televise courts, democratise them by making basic justice data available to all

6th September 2011 by William Perrin

The government’s small step today towards televising some courts business is welcome. It’s surreal that these public institutions, with a strong tradition of viewing by citizens should not be on TV and radio.   But there is a much bigger opportunity here – to open up to the whole of society information on what happens in the local and national courts.

If you go to a court sit in the public gallery as a member of the public and make notes you can find out who gets sentenced to what.  But if you don’t go you have no way of finding out.  Courts are almost completely opaque to the citizenry as i wrote a couple of years ago when trying to get basic results data about local crime.  It’s almost as if the presiding judges and magistrates are embarrassed by their work.  The press have in large part given up on reporting routine business in courts, tending through economic pressures to focus only on the most sensational crimes in local papers.  And even the Today programme this morning instantly acknowledged that this is what the media would do with televised trial sentencing.  I also get reports of bizarre behaviours by court staff that thwart reporting of courts by specialist press agencies.

In managing courts data there are legitimate issues around helping prevent discrimination against people who have served their sentence.  But the approach is an Orwellian one that tries to obscure public information about the sentence you were given, trying to delete history under the concept of spent offences.   It’s substantially out of kilter with other discrimination legislation and according to current government rhetoric on the riots has the balance of public interest wrong.  The concept of spent offences is deeply embedded in the justice system and there’s a huge public policy conundrum here that no one is grasping.

I am a member of the Transparency Panel for Crime and Justice and will help the panel tackle this as part of our work.  One suggestion is that we find a Crown and Magistrate court with a presiding judge/magistrate that wants to run an experiment in open data.  Views welcome in the comments.

  • About
  • Latest Posts
Follow Will
William Perrin
Founder of Talk About Local, Trustee of the Indigo Trust, Tinder Foundation, 360Giving, co-founder Connect8, former member of UK Government transparency panels, former Policy Advisor to UK Prime Minister, former Cabinet Office senior civil servant.Open data do-er, Kings Cross London blogger. Loves countryside. Two small children.
Follow Will
Latest posts by William Perrin (see all)
  • So what does the digital charter mean? - 21st June 2017
  • Hyperlocal blog can help hold power to account in tower block blaze - 14th June 2017
  • A vision for regulating the digital sphere after Brexit? - 6th April 2017

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: #opendata, #openjustice, crime, justice

Footer

Search

  • Contact
  • Guidelines
  • Legal

© 2022 · talk about local · Maintained by Mike