Tag Archive for government

Local media and Jeremy Hunt

[note - within minutes of publishing this some people have pointed out that the original title could be mis-construed given recent spoonerisms on the radio.  This is abosolutely not my intention a- 'the local hunt' is a fox hunting phrase from my childhood brought up in Northamptonshire's Pytchley country.  Please behave for heavens sake.  Radio4 do you see what you've done...]

Like any good recently elected politician Jeremy Hunt is fixated on delivering his manifesto commitment:

‘Our plans to decentralise power will only work properly if there is a strong, independent and vibrant local media to hold local authorities to account. We will sweep away the rules that stop local newspapers owning other local media platforms and create a new network  of local television stations.’ (Conservative Manifesto page 76)

Although the government inevitably budged on one or two manifesto commitments elsewhere we seem to be at the point where this one is going ahead.  So for the web community it’s time to roll up sleeves and work out how to help the government and the country make the best of the proposals.

On Friday 4 January the Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport came to Birmingham to meet people from the local web, press, radio and tv industries (agenda and attendees).  The Secretary of State was sincere, impassioned and on top of his brief, for telly.  He also limited the fatuous comparisons with Birmingham Alabama.

Against his expectation, the meeting told Jeremy Hunt that his proposals weren’t ambitious enough.  He needs to aim higher for local media and in particular to embrace the web – in its approach to production and content.

Debra Davis of CityTV regaled us with tales of local TV in Canada.  On web production the Julia Higginbotham of innovative Aquila TV drew out the point that trad. telly made in trad. ways will always be expensive – but it’s what the TV industry in the UK regulatory environment defaults to.  The government can send simple regulatory signals that it wants to see radical innovation in content production to open up new methods.  By using modern methods more than the specified two hours can be produced locally and the mix broadened beyond video.  Jeremy Hunt seemed to take this.

On web content Dave Harte, Nick Booth and I stressed that the superb Birmingham social web was far richer deeper and more diverse than any TV station.  This should be encouraged in its own right as an immediate answer to the problems the manifesto commitment seeks to solve – local accountability.  Local web content is also as banker against problems with complex and necessarily risky traditional local TV – much of it is already there now and more can be devleoped.   Again some simple, low cost regulatory signals could bring this about by making media companies seek out and nurture local web content.

Stacey Barnfield from the Mail and Phil Riley of BRMB both made the point that local TV will have to fight for an advertising cake dominated by radio and the press.  It might grow the cake a bit but the government’s plans will be disruptive for the local media ecology.  For me there’s a reductionist logic here – it’s hard to point anywhere to a TV station that is run more cheaply than a local radio station and making TV ads is more expensive than radio or print or web.  And it’s not as if the market is awash with local ad money.

Jeremy Hunt was good in the meeting – sharp, articulate, very focussed on the manifesto commitment.  But I was struck though that he hasn’t been briefed properly on the hyperlocal web.  He was asking some pretty basic questions and was only looking through the lens of businesses providing local news information and connections rather than the big society writ large that best describes most hyperlocal sites.

There’s nothing wrong with this as a newish minister – you can’t know everything and need to be briefed up.  He has the Olympics, the deficit and other stuff to worry about and the government has set a break-neck pace since the election.  It took a while to get Sion Simon and his colleagues up to speed, but it was worth it.  It would be a great shame if the government was to miss an opportunity to help a vibrant new web sector that would prop up its manifesto commitment through an over focus on one technology.

Jeremy if you are reading this then are are some answers to some of the questions you asked – if you will allow us in for a briefing we can show you more:

Hyperlocal sites in general have exceptionally low costs – they are a volunteer effort using simple blogging platforms that are either free or may cost £10-£20 a month to run found by volunteers.  Some sites make a little through advertising that may cover their web costs or buy a new laptop.  A few make a bit more that supports local enterprises, a very small number are self sustaining small businesses.  Think community radio but with much lower costs, no licensing nonsense and much simpler technology.

Local listings – remember this is the web so if someone somewhere else is providing listings then a local sites doesn’t need to.  In Birmingham and Isle of Wight though there are two superb hyperlocal listing sites.  LondonSE1 also has good listings.

High quality news – when a local site gets stuck into an issue it easily outdoes the mainstream media.  Strong examples are the coverage of the Vestas dipute by Ventnorblog, Kraft-Cadbury by Bourneville Village (Dave Harte who was in the meeting), Stoke council’s expensive phone number by PitsnPots to name but a few.

Jeremy Hunt gave no explanation of why the government dropped the Roger Parry language about multimedia content stations and was focussing on telly.  This had puzzled the burgeoning hyperlocal web community and I was astonished to see Kelvin McKenzie come out in favour of local web content instead of local TV (like seeing a T-Rex go vegetarian).   But with some simple signals to the TV people to embrace local grass roots web content, this could be reversed, Britain’s hyperlocal web scene accelerated still further and we would see early delivery of the aims of the Mainfesto commitment and a boost to the big society on the ground.

There was one final comment from one of our hosts at BCU – what happens when you connect your TV to the internet? Jeremy Hunt fell back on stock answers about the delayed BBC/C4 etc Youview offering.  I thought that a very parochial view – when the TV connects natively to the web , everything changes, you don’t just flip into someone else’s EPG.  It’s only about recommendations from friends, celebs you trust and corporate media brands won’t get much of a look in.

UK Gov Camp 2011 sessions of localism and hyperlocal sites and making a difference with data – notes and links

With Mike Rawlins, Nicky Getgood and Clare White from talk about local I had an enjoyable day at #UKGC11 at MicrosoftHQ on Saturday.  Thanks to Dave Briggs and Steph Grey for organising.  I convened sessions on localism and making a difference with data.

The localism session cantered through a whole range of hyperlocal issues with about 25 people crammed in the room.  Against a background of the localism bill that will require much more local discussion and consultation in critical areas such as planning and budgeting.  We figure that hyperlocal websites and tweets can play a helpful role in that.  There’s a simple plain English guide to the Bill, but the Bill will change as it goes through Parliament.  The discussion pinpointed several critical resources for beginners to local sites:

1 – Damian Radcliffes superb slide deck that covers local grass roots media in the uk from soup to nuts.

2 – Hugh Flouch and Kevin Harris excellent research into the impact of local sites conducted in the field

3 – If those two make you want to set a site up then turn to talk about local’s popular, easy to follow resources on how to make a simple site and then our real world guide with dozens of examples on what to write on it.

People should have a look more broadly at Nick Booth’s remarkable social media surgeries

We looked at a great range of well established hyperlocal sites

and a load of hyperlocal sites created in the last year or two by talk about local trainees such as

We also had a giggle at the in-character Ambridge Village hyperlocal site that talk about local worked with the BBC on.

On making a difference with data Janet Hughes of the GLA, Vicky Sargent of Boilerhouse and Kate Sahota of Warwickshire Council and I led a discussion on moving from publishing data to helping people use it.  Boilerhouse is running a project for Improvement and Efficiency West midlands to help people make a difference with data – they have a holding site up while talk about local and others help gather material, especially people talking about data, how they might use it  and what the obstacles might me. I have  fair few interviews now with data users and potential users on my audioboo page.  This followed on from my own and Phil Archer’s comments on a Guardian data blog article which took a poke at the government data store.  Phil also wrote up the session.

The consensus in the room was a need for the data community to engage with people who campaign out in ‘the real world’ – engaging with activists that organise demos, campaing to save libraries etc.  And make them aware of the new open data movement, the subtle shifts in FOI and to help with skills in manipulating large data sets.  A lot more could be done with simple data that can be used in a spreadsheet without having to do big data manipulations – the spreadsheet skills are in far greater supply.  Tim Davies talked about his idea for a ‘open data cookbook’ to help people use data for real world campaigning.  I suggested that we need for instance a list of bits of data people could use to save their local library.  Kate Sahota has blogged about the blinding obviousness of this.

Some great links were shared on data in the voluntary sector, a site to help people find data, a site on data for neighbourhood renewal, my own use of data to help get a street light fixed.

E-petitions – system reform needed to reap the benefits of digital engagment in policy

One of the nice things about epetitions was that it never promised to be anything more than a faithful online version of offline petitions.  Petitions have been a staple of British political life for 400 years ‐ they are well understood as being a crie de coeur , a simple way of salving a politicial conscience ‐ ‘I must do something to save the unicorns, but i don’t know what else to do other than sign this petition outside the shopping centre or that someone has emailed to me.’

Only a statistically insignificant number of petitions over the last 400 years have led to any form of political change whether presented on parchment or online.  Yet tens of millions of people have signed them.  As a form of political engagement only voting is more popular.   Given this long history, people must think the public very dim if they don’t understand the deal with petitions when they sign them.

Epetitions met a demand for a form of political engagement that fits with modern busy lifestyles.  You could set one up in a few clicks and contribute in seconds from the comfort of your own home. And above all they were demand-led by the public, not by lobby groups nor politicians.  They put a C21st interface on a C18th political system. I was one of the management team for the Downing Street e-petitions work.  It’s easy to forget, but the 1.8m-odd people who signed the anti-road pricing petition dominated the national press for weeks.

For the British government to engage more fully online, system reform is needed to provide the mindset and capacity for mass online engagement.  British government institutions have evolved over the centuries based on the postal system ‐ policy engagement by post both chokes the volume of engagement and prevents individuals banding together.  When the telephone became a means of mass service delivery the contact centre was adopted by the public services as a means of handling 300million phone calls a year.  Sadly this service delivery adaptation has seen only little replication in electronic engagement on policy.  Innovation in policy engagement is always firmly on the issues and terms that policy makers set.

The use of the Delib tool in the money saving and liberty exercises illustrated this nicely ‐ whatever the strength and weaknesses of the tool, including some shameful abusive language on the HMT website when moderation broke down,  it’s hard to say that the system coped well with the volume or nature of comments.  You can keep bolting on new front-ends as much as you like but deep and widespread system reform is needed to take advantage of mass online engagement.  This isn’t a problem unique to Britain – the Obama administration when in power hasn’t been able to keep up the pace of its online engagment when campaigning for election.

I was amused that in the Guardian story today someone in Whitehall is briefing against a website.  Check that: someone can be bothered to brief anonymously against a website. This of course isn’t the preserve of the current administration.  When working on e-petitions in 2006-2007 I was generously labelled as a prat to the national press by an anonymous cabinet minister.

What should government do to help hyperlocal news? Cabinet group – post it notes

With Rachel Sterne of Ground Report I co-chaired a meeting of folk interested in hyperlocal media in the UK.  The meeting was at the Department of Culture Media and Sport at the request of Sion Simon MP the UK Culture Minister in advance of the digital britain bill.  I shall post more on the discussion when i have had time to reflect. But to make the meeting as transparent as possible here is some of the core information.

The meeting had the Twitter hashtag #cabinet and there is a Tweetdoc.  The group was informed by Rachel Sterne’s slides dissecting the hyperlocal market and Douglas McCabe’s statistics from Enders.  Three good posts have already emerged; from Hannah Waldram at Podnosh including attendees and two from Paul Bradshaw

At the end of the session the participants stuck post its on a boards with suggestions for what the government should and shouldn’t do in this sector.  Here are those post its in the raw, as transcribed by DCMS staff and grouped into themes (some came from tweets).  The post its were un-attributed.

Things Government could / should do

Legal
From @ journotutor: Sort out libel laws, stop wasting money on writing national occupational standards and develop digital literacy.
Reform libel laws.
Water down/remove draconian libel laws.
Clarify legal responsibilities and liabilities of publishers of user-generated content.
Immunity for defamation arising from comments.

Funding
Open arts funding to journalism.
PAY ME.
Can we have a UK Knight Foundation to promote enterprise?
Run competition X Prize to innovate.
Increase size of community radio fund and open it up to all community media.
Subsidise local public service reporting for use by anyone (or tax breaks).

Access
Free Wi-fi in cities please!
Broadband for all.
Get MORE people online.
If you get people online they will figure out the rest.
Let the market determine localities and interests. The Govt needs to be transparent. Not a nanny.

Training/attitudes
Incentivise employers (subsidies, grants etc.) to train staff in citizen journalism technologies.
Work in schools as a valid local platform for area-wide learning and citizen journalism.
Support grass-roots digital training for active citizens.
Train citizens to be leaders not writers.
From @ dilyan-damyanov: Promote a culture where bloggers are treated with the same respect as journalists.
Treat hyper local authors, publishers, bloggers the same as traditional media.

BBC
Defend BBC and notion of public service (as opposed to market funded) information.
Open up BBC and other public service skills and support resources in e.g. journalism and law to 3rd parties.
Prevent BBC from launching more localised sites.
Require BBC to make video news content available to grass roots publishers and not just legacy players.
BBC create innovations fund.
Prompt the BBC to provide its technology for distributed media/journalism.

Local Authorities
Prevent councils from distorting publishing market by running ad-funded propaganda newspapers.
Get councils to publish data (in an open format).
Develop guidelines for councils so they realise they should treat local bloggers as they would the local press.
Provide clearer guidelines for council publications e.g. should they have a property section like Huf News does.
Make sure local authorities treat hyperlocal reporters the same way (?) they would traditional media  easy access to councillors / police etc.
Require councils to audio / video stream meetings and provide on-demand archive.

Access to data
Free all the data intelligently, faster and better. The more I think about it, the more I think this is the nearest there is to a single key.
From @johnbradford
Make information free by default (rather than FOI by request) and then keep out of the way and let hyperlocal blogs and twitter deliver.
Put out geocoded data easy to use.
Free up data and FOI.
Fund Geo-location tools / standards for info.
Release postcodes and other geo-data to encourage innovation.
Require all Govt / Public information to be published web first.
Set standards for publicly funded information.
Broaden FOI to include anyone spending public £.
When you free our data, combine it with an engagement plan that provides support to those that want to use it.

Other Ideas
Encourage ultra small scale experimentation with low overheads and low cost of failure.
Use open hyperlocal approach to enhance Total Place agenda and pilot different models.
Have a clear vision and strategy for democratic renewal / reform, which guides their investment.
Monitor and evaluate civic impact of citizen journalism net benefit or harm to civil society.
Act as a catalyst to encourage openness to dialogue with neighbourhood/hyperlocal sites.
Consider and publish impact assessments of major interventions eg newspapers.
Add journalism as act of supported volunteering.

WHAT GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT DO

Funding
Fund IFNCs. They will duplicate the BBC and distort the market.
Invest in new structures without consideration of their sustainability and legacy.
Fund unsustainable local publishing initiatives which don’t have ongoing (+multiple) funding sources.
Drag out the death cry of publishers through subsidy.
Bail out failing publishers or support traditional business models.
Bail out Channel 3 local/regional services.
Spend time/money on platforms.
Build a platform for news.

Councils
Stop council papers.
Don’t stop councils publishing.
Don’t stop councils publishing magazines, but set parameters to avoid undermining independent publishers (eg carrying ads).

Exclusion
Exclude people. Have multiple engagement platforms online and offline.
Forget that 15m are not online and that traditional media still has a role to play for many citizens.

BBC
Decimate the BBC. Yes it’s not perfect and could do more, but if we over slice and dice we may be worse not better off.
Introduce expensive top-down solutions and one- size-fits all platforms.

Other don’ts
Make their own apps for opening government data.
Use Government defined boundaries/identities to determine provision of tools and resources should enable self-definition of need/ [illegible]?
Assume information holes to plug are traditional media shaped.
Let big organisations have too much influence they’ll stifle.
Define journalism by platform.
Be a nanny!

[ends]

  • Newsletter sign up

  • New posts sign up