Tag Archive for democracy

Hyperlocal innovation: Google hangout for council reporting

parliament

Old style: Cameras keeping an eye on proceedings. Picture: UK Parliament on Flickr.

Google hangout – the video conference style service available on the Google + platform – may well have changed the way you do team meetings if you work in a distributed way as we do here at Talk About Local.

But how about for broadcasting your local council meeting? In an ambitious initiative, three bloggers at Lightmoor Life have recently done just that. Using multiple laptops they were able to stream the council chamber from different angles – even managing to hurriedly apply live captions to helpfully point out who’s who and their political allegiances etc.

Read more

Neighbourhood plans – is there an easy way?

Neighbourhood plans are a great idea but they need to be easy to produce and comprehend. The more complex and dense neighbourhood plans are, the fewer of them there will be. Is there any route to a genuinely simple neighbourhood plan that engages people?
The government website says: Read more

UK central government opens up local government to bloggers and local social media

In what should be a big leap forward for local democracy and community web media UK central government is to decree in law that local government meetings must be open to local bloggers, tweeters, community web forums etc.

I am not going to do the journalist trick of re-writing a press notice trying to give the impression it is my own wise words so the whole CLG thing is below.

Some observations -

overall this is a very good thing

it might be a world first, but if it is it reflects the weakness of local transparency in the UK that this has to be directed from Whitehall

this is central government acknowledging that hyperlocal web media is important in local scrutiny and accountability ‘The existing media definition will be broadened to cover organisations that provide internet news thereby opening up councils to local online news outlets. ‘

hopefully this will open up the mysterious world of ‘cabinet local government’ where tight groups meet to make major decisions with no public scrutiny

local social media can really open up council-led meetings in new ways if the chair co-operates (see this piece i did in Islington using a blog, audio boo and storify) and bloggers can lead the way as we see the excellent Ventnor Blog doing on the Isle of Wight.

I do hope that this applies to TfL I would dearly like to attend meetings on cycle safety

local TV with tens of millions of public subsidy for a scant 18 areas in the first round doesn’t get a mention. You can find my evidence on Local TV here.

the caveat ‘remove unnecessary and bureaucratic red tape on forward plans’ needs investigating – plans can be an important part of scrutiny, they give you a fixed target against which to judge subsequent performance.

good to see Chris Taggart feature in the press notice – Openly Local has done much that was regarded as impossible in trying to bring some order and structure to online publishing of council information. Chris is a real hero

it’s a delight to know that Margaret Thatcher once led a move to open up council meetings in the 1960s, it’s just a shame that she didn’t follow through rather harder with expanding FOI in the 1980s when in power.

Here’s the CLG press notice.

>

TOWN HALL DOORS UNLOCKED TO SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGGERS

New law changes to introduce greater openness and transparency in executive councils meetings will mean all decisions including those affecting budgets and local services will have to be taken in an open and public forum, Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles announced today.

Ministers have put new regulations before Parliament that would come into force next month to extend the rights of people to attend all meetings of a council’s executive, its committees and subcommittees.

The changes will result in greater public scrutiny. The existing media definition will be broadened to cover organisations that provide internet news thereby opening up councils to local online news outlets. Individual councillors will also have stronger rights to scrutinise the actions of their council.

Any executive decision that would result in the council incurring new spending or savings significantly affecting its budget or where it would affect the communities of two or more council wards will have to be taken in a more transparent way as a result.

Crucially councils will no longer be able to cite political advice as justification for closing a meeting to the public and press. In addition any intentional obstruction or refusal to supply certain documents could result in a fine for the individual concerned.

The changes clarify the limited circumstances where meetings can be closed, for example, where it is likely that a public meeting would result in the disclosure of confidential information. Where a meeting is due to be closed to the public, the council must now justify why that meeting is to be closed and give 28 days notice of such decision.

As a consequence of the greater levels of transparency around meetings, the Government is able to remove unnecessary and bureaucratic red tape on forward plans introduced by legislation in 2000.

Eric Pickles said:

“Every decision a council takes has a major impact on the lives of local people so it is crucial that whenever it takes a significant decision about local budgets that affect local communities whether it is in a full council meeting or in a unheard of sub-committee it has got to be taken in the full glare of all the press and any of the public.

“Margaret Thatcher was first to pry open the doors of Town Hall transparency. Fifty years on we are modernising those pioneering principles so that every kind of modern journalists can go through those doors – be it from the daily reporter, the hyper-local news website or the armchair activist and concerned citizen blogger – councils can no longer continue to persist with a digital divide.”

Chris Taggart, of OpenlyLocal.com, which has long championed the need to open council business up to public scrutiny, added:

“In a world where hi-definition video cameras are under £100 and hyperlocal bloggers are doing some of the best council reporting in the country, it is crazy that councils are prohibiting members of the public from videoing, tweeting and live-blogging their meetings.

Notes to Editors

1. The Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012 (the 2012 Regulations) will come into force on 10 September 2012. Changes include:

Presumption in favour of openness: In the past councils could cite political advice as justification for closing a meeting to the public and press, or state that decisions being made were not ‘key decisions’. The new regulations create a presumption that all meetings of the executive, its committees and subcommittees are to be held in public (regulation 3) unless a narrowly defined legal exception applies. A meeting will only be held in private if confidential information would be disclosed, or a resolution has been passed to exclude the public because exempt information is likely is be disclosed, or a lawful power is used to exclude the public in order to maintain orderly conduct at the meeting (regulation 4).

- Confidential information is information provided to the council by a Government department upon terms which forbid disclosure to the public or information which statute or a court order prohibits from being disclosed to the public.

- Exempt information is set out in Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972 and it includes information about a person, or information that would reveal their identity, consultations or negotiations relating of labour relations, or information in connection with preventing and detecting crime.

New legal rights for citizen reporters: Local authorities are now obliged to provide reasonable facilities for members of the public to report the proceedings as well as accredited newspapers (regulation 4). This will make it easier for new ‘social media’ reporting of council executive meetings thereby opening proceedings up to internet bloggers, tweeting and hyperlocal news forums.

Holding private meetings: In the past council executives could hold meetings in private without giving public notice. Where a meeting is to be held in private, the executive or committee must provide 28 days notice during which the public may make representations about why the meeting should be held in public. Where the notice requirements for a private meeting and an agreement of the chairman of the relevant overview and scrutiny committee or chairman of the relevant local authority has been obtained, the decision-making body must publish a notice as soon as reasonably practicable explaining why the meeting is urgent and cannot be deferred (regulation 5).

Less red tape for councils: Removing internal bureaucracy introduced by the last Government about ‘key decisions’, quarterly reports and ‘forward plans’. Instead, a document explaining the key decision to be made, the matter in respect of which a decision would be made, the documents to be considered before the decision is made, and the procedures for requesting details of those documents, has to be published (regulations 9).

Special urgent decision: Where it is impossible to meet the publication requirements before a key decision is made and an agreement has been obtained from the chairman of the relevant overview and scrutiny committee or the relevant local authority to make the key decision, the decision maker must publish a notice to explain the reasons why the making of the decision is urgent (regulation 11). Previously no notice was required.

Stronger rights of individual councillors: Where an executive has in its the possession a document that contains materials relating to a business to be discussed at a public meeting, members of the local authority have additional rights to inspect such a document at least five days before the meeting (regulation 16). Previously no timescale existed.

Stronger rights for scrutiny members: Where the executive decides not to release the whole or part of a document to a member of an overview and scrutiny committee as requested by a councillor, it must provide a written statement to explain the reasons for not releasing such document (regulation 17).

Publication requirement: Publication of any notice by a decision-making body or a proper officer; or any document in relation to a key decision or public meeting and background papers must be on the relevant local authority’s website (regulations 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 15, and 21).

1. The Public Bodies (Admission to Meetings) Act 1960 opened up meetings to the public, allowing members of the public and press to attend meetings of certain public bodies including councils. Margaret Thatcher was the backbench MP who championed this as a Private Members Bill.

2. Part 5A of the Local Government Act of 1972 applies to access to meetings and documents of the full council and committees of the councils. It states that ‘duly accredited representatives of newspapers’ should be afforded ‘reasonable facilities’ to attend council meetings ‘for the purpose of reporting proceedings for those newspapers’. It also sets out that for those parts of council meetings that are open to the public, councils are prevented from ejecting members of the public unless they are guilty of disorderly conduct or other ‘misbehaviour’.

3. The Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 provides for greater public access to local authority meetings reports and documents subject to specified confidentiality provisions; to give local authorities duties to publish certain information; and for related purposes.

 

Shining a light on the democratic process in Kington

In the last in this mini-series to celebrate some of the remarkable sites which www.talkaboutlocal.org has worked with over the past few years I take a look at the vibrant Kington Blackboard.

Voter apathy in local elections is a well-known situation up and down the country – less than 50% in many places during the 2011 local elections.

But the difference in the Shropshire village of Kington was that people were getting fed up of their entirely co-opted council – a situation that had been in place for ten years.

They wanted to do something about it as Emma Phillips explained.

The town council was in disarray and people felt that they took decisions without consultation. People were unhappy so we felt setting up a website was a good way to change the situation.

That decision in 2009 put in process a chain of events which this year saw a total of 23 people standing in the 15 seats and resulted in a fully elected council.

But the path to the democratic turnaround hadn’t been a straightforward one – and a curiously seasonal tale of commerce, Christmas lights, electricity blackouts and the inevitable appearance of a real-life Scrooge proved to be the unlikely turning point.

Rumours of a dispute between the town council and traders in settling the previous year’s bill for the traditional Christmas light display were reaching the Kington Blackboard – would the show go on?

“A lot of people used the Blackboard to make their feelings known, more and more people came on to talk about it”.

A posting to the site on November 30 announced that the stand-off was over. The Chamber of Trade claimed.

“At a Chamber meeting last night (23rd Nov) it was recognised that if left to the Council,there would be no Lights. Kington Town Council were first advised in May by the Chamber, that it would be having nothing to with the Lights and it was only at their last meeting in November, that a decision was made to offer a contract to an outside organisation to put up the lights. Having already decided not to enter into any financial arrangements with the Council,the Chamber decided that for this year,members and supporters would put up the Lights without input from the Council.”

It seemed that the show would go on and the lights bedecked the streets as usual.

But only briefly. A person the site nicknamed Scrooge made the first of his many appearances in the town’s lights saga. One night the lights went out and the villagers learned there had been complaints made to the sub-contractors and the electricity authority over the validity and safety of the displays.

After checks established the lights were properly erected, the show did indeed go on.

But it was the shining of light into the workings of local bureaucracy that ended up illuminating the community for a far longer period than the yuletide display.

Current challenges
Having achieved its primary aim in changing the council’s relationship with the local community, the Blackboard’s current challenge is keeping the site interesting and relevant.

Emma and volunteer Hannah James are the main authors of material on the site as well as undertaking moderation of comments and postings to ensure nothing “racist, religious, sexist, political or slanderous”.

They are carrying out a review of activity over the next couple of months and coming up with ideas for the site’s future.

“Things have changed radically since we have a fully elected council. It’s much more pro-active and listening.

“Momentum is the difficult thing and now it’s hard to keep it going because there isn’t a contentious issue and people have got what they wanted with a fully elected council.

“We would like it to carry on so we are looking at how to make sure it stays in the public eye.”

* Visit Kington Blackboard at http://www.kingtonblackboard.org.

Trumpeting the success of Cricklade

crickladebugle

In the third of this mini-series to showcase some of the remarkable websites and blogs we’ve had the pleasure to be involved with, I hear from The Cricklade Bugle.

Contacting Peter of The Cricklade Bugle for our interview over Skype found him in thoughtful mood, working through the ins and outs of a dilemma with the potential for legal problems.

“I’ve recorded a meeting that was held about the local school” he explained “now I need to work out what I should do with that recording.”

It’s a problem many professional journalists have to wrestle with from time-to-time but Peter doesn’t have the back-up of an experienced newsroom to inform his decision as the retiree is the sole writer at the Bugle.

But working with multimedia – and all the considerations the immediacy that style of reportage involves – is nothing new for Peter.

Since launching the Bugle during a Talk About Local training session in February 2010, Peter has reported on events and community issues in the north Wiltshire town.

I have learnt to add Photos (Flickr), Videos (YouTube), Presentations (SlideShare), Google Maps and now on Twitter @CrickladeBugle and Facebook. Not bad eh! I have used the notes at the talk about local website. Now I feel completely confident about it.

The website has already been used by Cricklade Town Council and Wiltshire Council to consult the local community about issues such as refuse collection, car parking and redevelopment of the leisure centre. His coverage has included video reporting from a public town meeting, viewed by between 50 and 100 people.

But moves to take his camera into the decision-making meetings of the council are proving to be more tricky – at present he’s been advised that ‘legal reasons’ mean only an employee of the council could be tasked with such filming. Legal reasons that Peter is quietly investigating further.

“I am not surprised. Organisations always want to stay in control,” is his take on the issue.
Maybe it’s this quiet, but dogged, approach that means The Bugle has become such a relied upon resource for the local community.

In the 18 months it has operated, the site has formed good relationships with local MP James Gray has regular contributions from a Wilshire councillor, the historial society and a host of local events organisers looking for their details to be posted on the site.
“I am getting quietly into the confidence of people and have been at public meetings where someone has said ‘ I read that in The Bugle’.” he laughs.

Peter says he keeps up-to-date with how other community websites are progressing via the Talk About Local website, getting tips for improving his own site and sharing his support for new initiatives via Twitter.

He now hopes to develop the site further and encourage some more contributions over upcoming issues such as consultations on where local amenities should be housed and the proposals for a merger of local schools.

“I think it’s very early days for these hyperlocal sites and it needs some big major problem to bring the local community together.

“It’s a slow process, an organic growing process”

* The Cricklade Bugle is at http://cricklade.info.

  • Newsletter sign up

  • New posts sign up